Sunday, December 14, 2008


New Rapid-Response Forces to Bolster Homeland Defense Mission

--In the event of civil disturbances and some other types of national emergencies other designated U.S. military units could be ordered by the president to help civil authorities establish order as part of the Garden Plot domestic security plan. 12 Dec 2008 Pentagon officials have established a new rapid-response joint task force and plan to create two more in coming years to bolster assistance to civil authorities following potential chemical, biological or nuclear attacks or 'natural' disasters, a senior U.S. official said here yesterday. The new units will team with other federal agencies in support of local responders... Paul McHale, assistant secretary of defense for homeland defense and Americas’ security affairs, told American Forces Press Service and Pentagon Channel reporters. The first new 4,700-member task force was assigned to a component of U.S. Northern Command on Oct. 1, McHale said. Plans are to stand up the other two new joint task forces in 2010 and 2011, respectively, McHale said. [Bye-bye, Posse Comitatus]

Emergency Response Units Won't Perform Law Enforcement, Official Says Faxts News
all 6 news articles »

Critics question plans to deploy 20000 troops in US for domestic ...


http://dystopianmedia.blogspot.com/

Civil libertarians and plain old libertarians are sounding the alarm over Pentagon plans to station 20,000 uniformed troops stateside to respond to domestic “catastrophes,”including nuclear, chemical or biological attacks, the Washington Post reports. The deployment, reported by The Colorado Independent’s Erin Rosa a month ago, includes a 4,700-troop combat brigade based at Fort Stewart, Ga., under the command of the U.S. Northern Command’s Gen. Victor E. Renuart Jr., in Colorado Springs.

Members of Congress and the Bush administration have been pushing for years to bolster domestic military preparedness, claiming it’s the only way to respond to a terrorist attack using weapons of mass destruction. Critics counter the move is contrary to the 130-year-old Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts the military’s role in domestic law enforcement. Here’s the law, in its entirety, cited in a 2002 Department of Homeland Security article arguing that its common interpretation is flawed:

Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

— Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 1385


published in the Federal Register would allow certain civilians to call American soldiers into action inside the U.S. to prevent environmental damage or respond to “special events” and “other domestic activities.”

The alarming warning is contained in proposed rules published last week for the Department of Defense’s
“Defense Support of Civil Authorities” plan.

Under the U.S. Constitution, soldiers inside the country essentially are tasked with the responsibility of quelling “insurrections” and repelling invasions as well as making sure each state has access to the republican form of government.

But the new rules go far beyond that, essentially establishing a plan to activate the U.S. military inside the country to deal with social issues under provisions that appear to be devoid of any connection to the Constitution, according to an expert.



Christmas Comes Early for Cottonbalers
Military.com - Dec 1, 2008
As the 4th Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division's mechanized infantry battalion, the "Cottonbalers" of the 3-7th Inf. Regt. faced hardship with good ...
ARMY BRIGADES TRAIN FOR HOMELAND RESPONSE MISSION
NewsWithViews.com, OR - Dec 12, 2008
Ms. Miles reported to news reporters, bloggers and Internet journalists that troops from the 3rd Infantry Division's 1st Brigade Combat Team are at the ...

MINA
Pentagon to Detail 20000 Troops for Domestic Security
Newsroom America, New Zealand - Dec 1, 2008
But Pentagon officials noted that the first response team, built around the Army's Third Infantry Division's 1st Brigade Combat Team, which which returned ...
Military Seeks To Boost Domestic Security CBS News
all 58 news articles »
Pentagon to deploy 20000 troops on domestic “anti-terror” mission
RINF.COM, UK - Dec 2, 2008
The forces represented in Operation Vibrant Response included the 1st Brigade Combat Team of the 3rd Infantry Division, the unit at Ft. Stewart; the 1st ...
"Emergency Preparedness" or Martial Law?
Center for Research on Globalization, Canada - Nov 23, 2008
In September, Army Times revealed that the 3rd Infantry Division's 1st Brigade Combat Team (BCT) was deployed October 1, under the day-to-day control of US ...
New Rapid-Response Forces to Bolster Homeland Defense Mission
Systems, GA - Dec 12, 2008
By Gerry J. Gilmore WASHINGTON - Pentagon officials have established a new rapid-response joint task force and plan to create two more in coming years to ...

U.S. troops' new mission: America's 'special events' 13 Dec 2008 New rules published in the Federal Register would allow certain civilians to call American soldiers into action inside the U.S. to prevent environmental damage or respond to "special events" and "other domestic activities." The alarming warning is contained in proposed rules published last week for the Department of Defense's "Defense Support of Civil Authorities" plan.

When Air Force's Killer Bugbots Attack

video

The U.S. military has been working for a while on tiny, buglike drones — to serve as miniature flying spies, Defense Department robot-makers say. But this video, from the Air Force Research Laboratory, shows that the military is also interested in turning these "Micro Air Vehicles," or MAVs, into biomorphic weapons that can lie in secret for weeks at a time — and then strike an adversary with lethal accuracy.

"Individual MAVs may perform direct-attack missions," says the video's gravelly voiced narrator. "They can be equipped with incapacitation chemicals, combustible payloads or even explosives for precision-targeting capability."




National Guard Take Control of City Jail - Urban Warfare Martial Law Riot FEMA Camp

Just to let everyone knwo, that I we used to have our family reunion there at Muscatatuck State Park every year. My family is from that whole part of S.E. Indiana.

video
Indiana National Guard Take Control of City Jail -plus pics of training village


http://www.mutc.in.ng.mil/

1,000 Acres
70 Buildings
2,000+ Rooms
1 - 5 Story Buildings
20 - 3 Story Buildings
16 - 2 Story Buildings
6 Split Level Buildings
14 Single Level buildings
9 Buildings with basements
One mile of tunnels
All are operational and fitted with functional equipment.


Located in South Central Indianas Jennings County near Butlerville, Muscatatuck Urban Training Center (MUTC) is a secluded, self contained community, once home to the Muscatatuck State Developmental Center. The 1,000 acre site was turned over to the Indiana National Guard in July of 2005 and since has been continually evolving into a full-immersion contemporary urban training environment.

Those utilizing MUTC have access to a 180 acre reservoir and urban infrastructure consisting of 68 major buildings including a school, hospital, dormitories, light industrial structures, single family type dwellings, a dining facility and administrative buildings totaling approximately 850,000 square feet of floor space. Additionally the training area includes an extensive underground utility tunnel system and over 9 miles of roads and streets.

MUTC is a consortium of governmental, public and private entities that are pooling their unique capabilities in order to provide the most realistic training experience possible. Training that can be tailored to replicate both foreign and domestic scenarios and that can be utilized by various civilian and military organizations.

In its first year of operation the facilities at MUTC have been utilized by over 16,000 people from military, government and private agencies and is continually expanding training capabilities for future needs.

"People have tried to explain this, but you can't really grasp the capability until you see it first hand, this is big...we are spending millions trying to build this, and you already have it in Indiana"


Photobucket


ARMY BRIGADES TRAIN FOR HOMELAND RESPONSE MISSION



At $24263 an acre, what landowner would not love to lease to FEMA?
SunHerald.com, MS - Dec 2, 2008
Why didn't FEMA just haul all its used and unused travel trailers and mobile homes to Camp Shelby and let the military use them for target practice? ...
Cottages to undergo testing Biloxi Sun Herald
FEMA spends $28M storing trailers and mobile homes Picayune Item
all 4 news articles »
Fear For Sale!
Brazil Times, IN - Dec 5, 2008
Why according to them (and just ask them they know it all and you are just "asleep" and not aware) there are FEMA camps all over Indiana! ...

Worldfocus
Cities vulnerable as warfare goes urban
Worldfocus, NY - Dec 1, 2008
She writes at OpenDemocracy about the growing phenomenon of urban warfare, which puts cities and their residents on the front lines. ...

Canadians improvised new ways to fight an urban war among the ...
Owen Sound Sun Times, Canada - Nov 25, 2008
Fighting as a national unit under Canadian command for the first time in the war, the Canadians rewrote the rules about urban warfare. ...


The Science of the Future of War
Wired News - Nov 21, 2008
As if we needed any more reasons to confront the role of warfare in our lives, the present supply and future potential of WMDs should convince us that the ...


"Emergency Preparedness" or Martial Law?
Center for Research on Globalization, Canada - Nov 23, 2008
National Exercise Program: "Emergency Preparedness" or Martial Law? The Congressional Research Service (CRS) issued a 46-page report November 10, ...


Martial Law in America Redux
Nolan Chart LLC, VA - Nov 19, 2008
None of it had a thing to do with with the now-quotidian skinhead notion that President-elect Obama is laying plans for martial law. ...

Toys for Tots : Marine tells Camera Man those aren't Real 50 cal Guns at a Toys R' Us Store;
"They Are Computer Simulations"
They Are Computer Simulations - > WTF?





Israeli Intelligence Operating Down Under

Israeli Intelligence Operating Down Under from QuoTodt on Vimeo.
An Israeli company based in Melbourne is spread throught Oz operating Shopping Mall Stalls selling beauty products.

Aptly, the product they carpet bag is called "Seacret - Minerals From The Dead Sea".

These people have turned up at friends and families houses attempting to sell cheap art just like the Intelligence Op operating before and during 9-11 that was eventually broken by the Feds in the U.S.

Now they are "Down Under" and think there are "easy pickings". Think again you brood of vipers. Back to the hole from which you came and take Leon Wende with you.



Chicago Cops Dodge Blagojevich/Sears Tower Investigation

Saturday, December 13, 2008 11:04 PM
From:

by William B. Fox


IMMEDIATE – A Chicago Police Department official, who refused to be identified by name, stated that city law enforcement would avoid investigating allegations against embattled Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich and Mayor Richard M. Daley.

Former Army intelligence officer, newspaper editor Capt. Eric H. May, charged that the governor and mayor were co-conspirators in a May 2-4, 2006 attempt to sabotage Chicago’s Sears Tower. The 110-story building had recently been bought by Larry Silverstein, who owned the twin towers that collapsed on 9/11.

Even with last week’s revelations of widespread corruption and conspiracy by Illinois and Chicago officials, the former NBC editorial writer’s allegations would seem outlandish – were they not backed up by a document trail connecting everyone from top government officials to media mainstays and even active-duty military intelligence. All of them coalesced into an informal alliance against the governor, the mayor and Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff, who was heading up exercises set to simulate the collapse of an unnamed downtown Chicago skyscraper. All of them believed that the chance of an attack against the Silverstein property was real.

The documents tell the tale.

On April 26, 2006, advised of a possible attack by inside sources, May put in calls to Illinois National Guard Public Affairs Officer Col. Tim Franklin and Chicago Police Public Information Officer Laura Kubiak. Both confirmed the existence of terror exercises rehearsing the demolition of Sears Tower. Alarmed, May issued RED ALERT: “CHICAGO 911” CONFIRMED, which was quickly posted worldwide. http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.net/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=135307

The next day, April 27, the Illinois governor's office issued a press release confirming the just-exposed exercises, revealing that the exercises, involving up to 2,000 participants, had been in the works – unannounced – for seven months. http://www.illinois.gov/PressReleases/ShowPressRelease.cfm?SubjectID=3&RecNum=4807

Shortly afterwards, May wrote Blagojevich directly. He copied contacts in the Defense and State Departments, stating his conviction that there was a treasonous plot afoot. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Chicago911inquest/message/44

After two days of silence from the governor’s office, May began to give interviews, expressing his doubts about Blagojevich and Daley. The Chicago mayor was curiously absent from the city at the time on a first-ever visit to Israel, in the company of Israeli intelligence.

"The Edge," hosted by radio journalist Daniel Ott, spread word about the suspicious exercises widely throughout the Midwest. http://theedgeam.com/interviews/CaptainMay 04.29.06.mp3

It may seem inconceivable that Chicago police would still shy away from investigating or even discussing the possibility of an official conspiracy, but May isn’t surprised.

“We should remember just how dangerous government can be. Every great American since the Founding Fathers has agreed on that point. No one should be surprised that ‘Blago’ and company are part of a conspiracy. It wasn’t so long ago that Illinois officials conspired with Al Capone. The Chicago cops stood by and played dumb then, too.”

Decorated Vietnam combat veteran Merlin Neadows, who was part of what has since come to be called the "Chicago Mayday Mission," is even harsher with Windy City law enforcement:

"They're a disgrace," the former infantryman said. "They know that we did their job while they hid back in 2006, and they're still hiding. If it hadn't been for us Internet infowarriors, Chicago would have had a terror attack for sure."

************ ********* **

William B. Fox is publisher of America First Books, www.americafirstboo ks.com, where he has archived Capt. May’s articles and analysis.





Are you PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT in your thinking? Do you know about the
religion of PATRIOTIC CORRECTNESS? Patriotic Correctness is a logical
fallacy of venerating cultural icons that defeat the purpose of
patriotism. One example of patriotic correctness is worshiping the
constitution of a government, preferring the written words of men over
the liberating word of God.

One of the reasons Americans are losing their freedom is because they
worship the Constitution instead of God Almighty. This is the greatest
fallacy of patriotic correctness.

Constitution worship is idolatry and a rejection of the Government of
God. To reject the Government of God is to unwittingly accept the rule
of a competing regime.

I found a Conservative Manifesto authored by Ken Maddox. At first
glance, one might think this manifesto is "patriotically correct," but I
found a few problems with some statements and logic in the manifesto.
The manifesto advocates patriotically correct Constitution worship. The
original manifesto is located at:
http://www.onemillionconservatives.org/Ken/blog/2/

The Manifesto states, "Conservatives believe in personal responsibility.
The individual, not the government is responsible for individual actions
and that all government should be limited and be representative of the
people."

This is contrary to what the Word of God states as contained in the Holy
Bible. The principle of personal responsibility is correct. But
government is not necessarily representative of the people. Government
is representative of the will of God, when applied correctly: "For unto
us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be
upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor,
The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace." [Isaiah 6:9]

So you see, government should represent the will of God, not the will of
"the people." If the will of the people is depraved and immoral, do you
still want government, "of the people?" The will of the people is often
worse than anarchy.

Says the Manifesto: "I believe this Constitution has produced the
greatest nation in the history of the world."

Using blind cultural iconic paradigm, it elevates the constitution to
godhood which is patent idolatry. The Manifesto puts the cart before the
horse. The Constitution did not produce the greatest nation in the
history of the world. A great nation produced the Constitution, not
vice-versa. Notice the religious belief that a piece of parchment
created a nation when it is the nation that created the parchment. God,
not a constitution, created the greatest nation in the history of the
world. And what does God say of the nations? "And out of his mouth goeth
a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall
rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the
fierceness and wrath of Almighty God." [Revelation 19:15]

The Manifesto states: "I believe the Constitution of the United States
is based on Judea Christian principals and it means exactly what it says."

There are many departures from Judeo-Christian principles in the
Constitution. Mainly, it establishes "we the people” as the supreme law
of the land. It purports to elevate the authority of men over the
authority of Almighty God. But the Bible says in Isaiah 9:7: "Of the
increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the
throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it
with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever." The
Constitution creates a form of government that is in competition with
the government of God. It makes the immoral will of the people, instead
of the righteous will of God, the supreme law of the land. The will of
the people today seems to be socialist, Marxist, and corporate-fascist
and the country is speeding that direction. The very constitution that
this Manifesto worships as sacred is AGAINST Christian Principles and
markedly against the Judean principle of a theocratic republic of
freemen. Anything that competes with the government of Christ is not
Christian, rather, anything that competes with the government of God is
anti-Christian.

The Manifesto continues with more blasphemy: "I believe our Constitution
gives us freedom and we use that freedom to elect officials to uphold
this belief and protect Christian Principals and Individual freedom to
accept or to reject them."

To say the Constitution gives us freedom is like saying the rain gives
us clouds. Freedom comes from God, not from a piece of parchment as the
Manifesto claims. This is more idolatry, replacing God with a created
image. And since the Constitution violates Christian principles, how can
it protect them? And since it places freedom in the hands of
representatives, how can it protect freedom of individuals? The
Manifesto starts out by saying individuals are responsible for
themselves, then contradicts itself by stating that representatives are
the protectors of individual freedom.

The Manifesto states: "I believe taxes are justified only to fund
necessary government spending and that the correct function of taxation
is to equitably collect only that revenue needed to fund the legitimate
activities of a constitutionally limited government. I believe in free
market economy, individual liberty, traditional values and morals, and a
strong national military for defense."

Taxes are a patent euphemism for armed robbery. How is that consistent
with Judeo-Christian principles that state, "Thou shalt not
steal.....Thou shalt not covet...anything that is thy neighbors'?" The
Manifesto praises "a strong national military for defense," but the Word
of God in Samuel Chapter 8 states, "But the thing displeased Samuel,
when they said, Give us a king to judge us...He will take your sons, and
appoint them for himself, for his chariots, and to be his horsemen; and
some shall run before his chariots. And he will appoint him captains
over thousands, and captains over fifties; and will set them to ear his
ground, and to reap his harvest, and to make his instruments of war, and
instruments of his chariots. ...And ye shall cry out in that day because
of your king which ye shall have chosen you; and the LORD will not hear
you in that day." This was God's response to the people wanting a king,
and commander-in-chief, with a national army like other nations.
Constitutional, maybe, but based on Judeo-Christian principles,
obviously not.

The army of Israel was a militia, not a national army. Every man and
every family was autonomous. They desired to give up their autonomy to
have a central power, which according to the book of Samuel, was a
rejection of God. The American states gave up their autonomy to have a
central federal power and national army, which was clearly a rejection
of God. That central government and central standing army has now grown
into a leviathan oppressor of the people, taking its young men for its
military-industrial complex, taxing American wealth out of existence,
taking the best lands and giving it to bureaucrats to manage, just as
God told the Children of Israel what the result of a king would be. It
does not matter if you elect a monarch or 535 kings in a legislature,
the effect will always be the same--a rejection of God, and thus a
rejection of His Divine Protection.

If you want to learn more about Government as it is intended by God,
read of how God led the Children of Israel out of Egypt then they formed
autonomous groups with a network of captains and ministers to serve the
needs of the congregations. There was no compulsory inclusion, only
compulsory exclusion for those who did not keep the Law of God. Today we
have a "constitutional government" that does not even recognize the
political existence of the family and the congregation, and FORCES
political participation and ungodly taxation at gunpoint. By separating
individuals from their families and congregations, and treating the
individual as a political unit through entitlements, benefits, and
compelled performance, the family, congregation, and tribe are bypassed
completely and power over the individual is centralized into the cruel
hand of a ravenous imperator. And those who object to the tyranny cry
that we need to worship the piece of supernatural parchment that enabled
the aristocracy and kleptocracy to seize power!

Read how Jesus returned everyman to his family and possession and set up
a government where the officers were titular only and had no exercising
power to compel obedience. This is the opposite of the Federal
Government that forces compliance with tens of thousands of laws written
by lawyers, of the lawyers, by the lawyers, for the lawyers.
http://www.hisholychurch.net/study/gods/index.html

Lawyers and politicians! False actors putting on a show! You make the
people obey laws that you are not subject to.

"Scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites!"

"Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to
be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers."

Before the U.S. Constitution was adopted, an antifederalist wrote:
"Before martial law is declared to be the supreme law of the land, and
your character of free citizens be changed to that of the subjects of a
military king-which are necessary consequences of the adoption of the
proposed constitution - let me admonish you in the name of sacred
liberty, to make a solemn pause. Permit a freeman to address you, and to
solicit your attention to a cause wherein yourselves and your posterity
are concerned. The sun never shone upon a more important one. It is the
cause of freedom of a whole continent of yourselves and of your fellow
men. . . . A conspiracy against the freedom of America, both deep and
dangerous, has been formed by an infernal junto of demagogues. Our
thirteen free commonwealths are to be consolidated into one despotic
monarchy. Is not this position obvious? Its evidence is intuitive . . .
. Who can deny but the president general will be a king to all intents
and purposes, and one of the most dangerous kind too-a king elected to
command a standing army. Thus our laws are to be administered by this
tyrant; for the whole, or at least the most important part of the
executive department is put in his hands. A quorum of 65
representatives, and of 26 senators, with a king at their head, are to
possess powers that extend to the lives, the liberties, and property of
every citizen of America. This novel system of government, were it
possible to establish it, would be a compound of monarchy and
aristocracy, the most accursed that ever the world witnessed. About 50
(these being a quorum) of the well born, and a military king, with a
standing army devoted to his will, are to have an uncontrolled power. .
. . " [The Antifederalist Papers No. 74]

This prophetic antifederalist warning to America echoes the stern caveat
of God to Israel in the Book of Samuel Chapter 8.

The Conservative Manifesto makes some true points, such as holding the
Ten Commandments as binding, but mixing some truth with error still
produces error. And as the Bible states, "God is not the author of
confusion."

There is a lot of worship of the "numinous constitution" in America.
Many patriots say the Constitution is sacred. To make a material thing
sacred in itself is the definition of idolatry. Until patriots stop
worshiping a man-made government and bowing to a graven image of
parchment, and prefer instead the government of God, His Law written on
men's hearts, men will continue to be subject to governments that
compete with God for power and glory.

Are men property of the state or are they free souls under God? Do you
believe in the government of men or the government of God? The decision
is a matter of faith. The ruler you have faith in, is the ruler you
shall have to obey. [Proverbs 12:24, Hebrews 6:12] And that /is/ a
Judeo-Christian Principle.




No comments: