I beat Alex Jones and Paul Watson to the punch with Video coverage.
w00p w00p
British Prime Minister repeats mantra to exploit financial meltdown in pursuit of centralization of power
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, January 26, 2009
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown will today call for the economic crisis to be used to create a "new global order," and a new form of internationalism, a mantra that is becoming all too familiar as globalists exploit the very problem they created to centralize power into fewer hands.
|
Crisis birth-pangs of a new global order: British PM
Press Trust of India, India -
London, Jan 26 (PTI) British Prime Minister Gordon Brown today said the current economic crisis should be treated as the "difficult birth-pangs of a new ...
The Age, Australia -
BRITISH Prime Minister Gordon Brown has taken the unprecedented step of calling on London's foreign media to issue a clarion call for a "new global economic ...
 | Brown sees 'new world order' after crisis AFP - LONDON (AFP) — Prime Minister Gordon Brown said Monday the financial crisis must not be an excuse to retreat into protectionism and instead be viewed as the ... |
 | PM seeks "new global order" Politics.co.uk, UK - By Alex Stevenson Gordon Brown will call for the creation of a "new global order" and action to avoid "financial mercantilism" in a speech later today. ... |
 | Problem birth of the new economy InTheNews.co.uk, UK - Employers and their workers are today bearing the brunt of the "difficult birth-pangs of a new global order" Gordon Brown says the global economic crisis ... |
Glenn Beck blames bad economy on existence of central banking system
By David Neiwert Sunday Jan 25, 2009 4:00pm
Download | Play 
Download | Play
It's no wonder that Fox's newest conserva-star addition to its Angry White Men lineup, Glenn Beck, has such an emotional affinity for Sarah Palin. Because like Palin, Beck is not just a conservative; he's actually a good old-fashioned right-wing populist.
For those who follow such phenomena, Beck made it explicit Thursday on his Fox News show when he launched into a segment seemingly devoted to the thesis that the whole problem with the economy lies not with capitalism, but boils down to the fact that we rely on a central banking system:
Beck: I don't believe we're the infection here. Look around the world. I got together with the Heritage Foundation and looked at all of the -- where is this crisis hitting? It's hitting capitalist, socialist, communist, totalitarian governments, all of them, and everything in between.
At some point -- if you're the doctor again in the emergency room -- and you really want to get all these people healthy, you gotta rule out -- OK, well, it's not capitalism. OK, what is it? You need to stop to ask the question that a doctor would ask in that situation: 'OK, everybody, where did you eat? What have you had to eat?' All of these countries all have that in common. They've all eaten at the same restaurant -- the restaurant of Central Banking.
It is a system that no one is accountable to. No one. The brilliant geniuses that are supposed to be protecting us -- that's why central banks are around -- 'We'll stop it, we'll make sure there's no recession, there's no depression, we'll just keep these bubbles from happening.' They never at one point -- if we were Patient Zero -- at one point in no country did they say -- 'Hey, what -- what -- don't follow the United States. Don't do that.' Never? They've had their hands in all of the food and that's what's making us sick. Will anyone look at the Central Banking system?
Hmmm. It's kind of hard to decipher Beck's inchoate jumble, but we'll try. He seems to think people are blaming capitalism itself -- but what I think has taken far more of the blame has been laissez-faire capitalism, especially as practiced by movement conservatives, who never saw a deregulation scheme they didn't love. Rather than cope with the mountain of evidence supporting this reality, right-wingers like Beck flee to the comfort of reliable old conspiracist anomie.
.
|
'Redflag': Realistic Air Combat Exercises’
Red Flag Air Exercises
The Red Flag exercises, held periodically at the Nellis Air Force Base since 1975, are very realistic aerial war games. The purpose is to give pilots from the U.S., NATO and other allied countries an opportunity to practice and refine their skills for real combat situations. This includes the use of "enemy" hardware and live ammunition for bombing exercises within the Nellis complex. The exercises with flares and all kinds of aircraft can make a spectacular show, especially at night. There are usually two or three sorties per day (except on weekends): One or two sorties during daytime and one in the evening or at night. The night exercises usually inlude only one half of the daytime forces.
Extra Red Flag week allows for more missions -
Nellis Air Force Base, Nev., is one of the largest fighter bases in the world. Aircraft from Nellis operate on the Nevada Test and Training Range, which offers more than 15,000 square miles of airspace and 4,700 square miles of restricted land. More than 75 percent of all live munitions used by the Air Force for training are dropped on the Nevada Test and Training Range. Many communities in southern Nevada see and hear Nellis aircraft 24 hours a day, seven days a week. From 100 feet above the ground to twice the speed of sound, Nellis conducts advanced combat training, performs operational test and evaluation, and develops tactics.
Related links:
- Tenets of Red Flag - official USAF document
- Nellis based Exercises - by British Military Aviation and Black Program Researcher Richard Cliff
- Red Flag ACMI Information - The ACMI equipment involved in the Red Flag Exercises, by Richard Cliff
- Scanner Frequencies - Radio frequencies used during the flag exercises
- Scanner Glossary - Code words and phrases used in radio transmissions
- Nellis AFB 57th Wing Radio Call Signs
- Official Nellis AFB web site - Red Flag information
- JEFX 06 Home Page - More information on JEFX
- Scramble: Airfield Guide for Nellis AFB - Includes a map, directions, frequencies, units and more
Berg v. Obama et al.: Check out how the People are being deceived
| http://oilforimmigration.org/ Hello Dan & friends Please bear with me as I JUMP ON yet another IGNORANT JOURNALIST for using the term "U.S. citizen". Because the truth has not yet penetrated their foot-thick craniums, let me approach the answer from an entirely different angle. (Excuse the comparatively rough language: kindness and logic have not worked with yellow journalists, to date.) When the corrupt bankers circa the Civil War saw that chattel slavery was doomed in America, they concocted an entirely new system of "wage slavery". See the infamous "Hazard Circular" in chief: http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/conclusn.htm The vivid pattern that has now painfully emerged is that "citizens of the United States", as defined in federal tax law, are the intended victims of a new statutory slavery that was predicted by the infamous Hazard Circular soon after the Civil War began. This Circular admitted that chattel slavery was doomed, so the bankers needed to invent a new kind of slaves. [end excerpt] The legal "experts" at that time knew full well that the Constitution prohibited DIRECT TAXES unless those taxes were duly APPORTIONED -- in the same manner as Representatives must also be APPORTIONED! And, yet in 1798 Congress did impose a DIRECT TAX properly, so available historical records PROVE that Congress has known all along how to do so: http://www.supremel aw.org/fedzone11 /htm/append- q.htm IN ORDER TO DERIVE MAXIMUM CASH FLOW FROM WAGE SLAVES IN AMERICA, THE BANKERS NEEDED TO DECEIVE ALL AMERICANS INTO BELIEVING -- WRONGLY -- THAT THEY WERE ALL "U.S. citizens" [sic]. So, the first thing they did was to persuade Congress to enact the 1866 Civil Rights Act, which uses the term "citizen of the United States" (sounds the same, yes?) in direct conflict with the Qualifications Clauses: http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/mitchell/quals.htm Congress can NOT amend the Constitution solely by means of legislation: only THREE-FOURTHS of the several States can amend the Constitution. See Article V: http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/whuscons/whuscons.htm#5 THEREFORE, the 1866 Civil Rights Act was a DELIBERATE DECEPTION -- founded upon the false notion that there was, and still is, ONLY ONE CLASS of citizens in America -- read "citizens of the United States" (small "c"). Partial proof of this latter statement can be confirmed in the definition of "Federal citizenship" in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition (very condemning of the Congress which enacted the 1866 Civil Rights Act!) Nevertheless, the research my office has done clearly proves that we have TWO (2) CLASSES OF CITIZENS in America, NOT ONE (1) CLASS: http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/twoclass.htm Citizens of the United States = State Citizens = eligible to be President citizens of the United States = federal citizens = NOT eligible to be President http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/palmbeach/ The HARSH CONCLUSION for Obama, therefore, is that he may not be President ... EVEN IF he was a federal citizen at the moment of his birth, and EVEN IF one or the other of his 2 biological parents were also federal citizens at his birth. And, to put icing on this yellow cake, there is now no constitutional authority for the proposition that federal citizens are also Citizens of the State(s) in which they reside, because the so-called Fourteenth Amendment was never lawfully ratified. See Dyett v. Turner (27 is not 28!) http://www.supremel aw.org/cc/ knudson/judnot09 .htm#dyett Finally, there are only 2 common law principles which Obama can invoke at this point in this CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS: "jus soli" (law of the soil, in Latin): BUT ... Kenya was NOT a State of the Union, and never was (President must be a State Citizen AT BIRTH) "jus sanguinis" (law of blood, in Latin): BUT ... his parents were NOT State Citizens at his birth (assumes facts not in evidence, at this juncture) Accordingly, the term "U.S. citizen" is further PROOF that people are being deceived -- DELIBERATELY DECEIVED: strictly speaking, the term "U.S. citizen" is NOT defined anywhere in applicable Federal statutes or regulations. Now you know why the United States applied for intervention ex rel. (ex relatione) in Berg v. Obama et al. http://www.supremel aw.org/cc/obama/ http://www.supremel aw.org/cc/obama/mandamus.htm Nobody else, and I MEAN NOBODY, has done due diligence concerning the "proper construction and common understanding" of the Qualifications Clauses, except maybe the California Supreme Court in the year 1855 here: http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chaptr11.htm In the fundamental law, the notion of a "citizen of the United States" simply did not exist before the 14th Amendment; at best, this notion is a fiction within a fiction. In discussing the power of the States to naturalize, the California Supreme Court put it rather bluntly when it ruled that there was no such thing as a "citizen of the United States": [Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855)] Now you know where we first obtained the phrase "proper construction and common understanding" ! Smell the rats yet? I CERTAINLY DO!! Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a) |
Mount Redoubt Volcano Escalates Alert to 'Code Orange' | |
| by Mitch Battros - Earth Changes Media
That didn't take long. -- New seismic activity at Mount Redoubt increased significantly Sunday and may be the prelude to an eruption, "perhaps within hours to days," the Alaska Volcano Observatory is reporting.
As presented in last year's three part article, there appears to be a connection between solar eclipse events and escalation in earthquakes and volcanoes. The science behind the cause is still suspect or hypothetical. Most studies do suggest a shift in magnetics in part related to the Earth's "dipole" as the culprit.
Earth's magnetic field (and the surface magnetic field) is approximately a magnetic dipole, with one pole near the North Pole and the other near the geographic South Pole. An imaginary line joining the magnetic poles would be inclined by approximately 11.3° (degrees) from the planet's axis of rotation. The cause of the field can be explained by dynamo theory.
Magnetic fields extend infinitely, though they are weaker further from their source. The Earth's magnetic field, which effectively extends several tens of thousands of kilometers into space, is called the magnetosphere.
Geologists monitoring Mount Redoubt volcano have upgraded the aviation color code for Redoubt from yellow to orange Sunday, indicating that an eruption may be imminent.
The volcano, which lies about 50 miles west of Kenai and 100 miles southwest of Anchorage last erupted over a four-month period, from 1989 to 1990. | |
Redoubt rumbling prompts volcano alert
Anchorage Daily News, AK -
By GEORGE BRYSON New seismic activity at Mount Redoubt increased significantly early Sunday and may be the prelude to an eruption, "perhaps within hours to ...
KSRM, AK -
Redoubt Volcano last erupted in December of 1989, according to Kate Bull of the Alaska Volcano Observatory. Bull said the eruption continued into April. ...
Geologists wary of Mount Redoubt eruption Fort Mills Times, SC - ANCHORAGE, Alaska — It's been nearly 20 years since Alaska's Mount Redoubt erupted, but geologists say an eruption may be imminent. ... |
Redoubt Volcano is Now Code Orange KSRM, AK - The Redoubt Volcano is now at Code Orange, because of elevated tremor activity on the volcano this weekend. The Alaska Volcano Observatory conducted an over ... |
Gary Lachman's new book Politics and the Occult: The Left, The Right, and the Radically Unseen is available from Amazon US and Amazon UK.
----------------------
Dark Sides: The Jung Case
Although Hitler apparently had little interest in the occult - as Mark Sedgwick writes, “Hitler had no sympathy for occultism of any variety,” - he had close contact with people who did, and the Nazi movement, while not the product of “black brotherhoods” or diabolical “unknown superiors,” was certainly amenable to some occult influences. Himmler’s SS infamously incorporated runic, pagan, and Grail elements and was deeply influenced by the ideas of the occultist Karl Maria Wiligut. One SS officer, Otto Rahn, wrote a bestselling book, Crusade against the Grail, associating the Cathars with the Grail legend. Hermann Wirth, author of the monumental The Rise of Mankind, used meditation to view the past and argued, like Bal Gangadhar Tilak, that the Aryan race began in the frozen north. In 1935 Wirth was a co-founder of the notorious Ahnenerbe, the Nazi “research unit” devoted to uncovering Germany’s ancestral Aryan heritage, whose efforts included sending the SS explorer Ernst Schäfer to the Himalayas to measure Tibetan skulls. And while Hitler himself may have rejected occultism, he was certainly aware of “the power of myth,” a phrase familiar to viewers of the journalist Bill Moyers’ fantastically successful series of interviews with the mythologist Joseph Campbell.
The electrifying power of the swastika; Albert Speer’s dazzling lighting effects at the Nuremberg rallies; Hitler’s “demonic” oratory and his own deification as the Führer; the romantic vision of a bucolic Germany rooted in “blood and soil,” as opposed to an urban, mechanical modernity - all were part of the myth of National Socialism that Hitler and his followers sold to an interested public. A myth was instrumental in Hitler’s success, the dark lie voiced in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Whether the Protocols were “true” or not probably never occurred to Hitler; what was important was that they agreed with his own views and that, like himself, many people believed they were true. (The people who believed in the Protocols weren’t necessarily unintelligent; one of their most fervent supporters was Henry Ford, father of the assembly line and mass production. Like many influential people, faced with evidence that the Protocols were forged, Ford refused to believe it.) Like the French syndicalist George Sorrel and the political philosopher Leo Strauss, Hitler knew that in politics, myth is often more important than the “truth,” a difficult commodity to pin down at any time. Reason and rationality are boring and demand effort. Myth bypasses the inhibitions of the critical mind, and reaches down to the vital forces below. This is what makes it exciting and enlivening. It is also what makes it dangerous. In saying this I am not arguing “against” myth, merely pointing out that it entails something more than just “following your bliss.”
Yet many at the time were willing to risk the danger and embrace myth over reason. One was the Swiss psychologist C. G. Jung, perhaps more than anyone else, the single most important figure in the reawakening of spiritual thought in modern times. Although for much of his career Jung obscured his interest in the occult, in his later years his writings on Gnosticism, alchemy, the paranormal, spiritualism, and even flying saucers brought these otherwise marginal areas into the field of respectable research. ... Read More »
No comments:
Post a Comment