- By Harry V. Martin and David Caul
There was just a small news announcement on the radio in early July after a
short heat wave, three inmates of Vacaville Medical Facility had died in non-air
conditioned cells. Two of those prisoners, the announcement said, may have died
as a result of medical treatment. No media inquiries were made, no major news
stories developed because of these deaths.
But what was the medical treatment that may have caused their deaths? The
Medical Facility indicates they were mind control or behavior modification
treatments. A deeper probe into the death of these two inmates unravels a
mind-boggling tale of horror that has been part of California penal history for
a long time, and one that caused national outcries two decades ago.
Mind control experiments have been part of California for decades and permeate
mental institutions and prisons. But, it is not just in the penal society that
mind control measures have been used. Minority children were subjected to
experimentation at abandoned Nike Missile Sites, veterans who fought for
American freedom were also subjected to the programs. Funding and
experimentations of mind control have been part of the U.S. Health, Education
and Welfare Department, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Central
Intelligence Agency through the Phoenix Program, the Stanford Research
Institute, the Agency for International Development, the Department of Defense,
the Department of Labor, the National Institute of Mental Health, the Law
Enforcement Assistance Administration, and the National Science Foundation.
California has been in the forefront of mind control experimentation. Government
experiments also were conducted in the Haight-Ashbury District in San Francisco
at the height of the Hippy reign. In 1974, Senator Sam Erwin, of Watergate fame,
headed a U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights studying the subject
of "Individual rights and the Federal role in behavior modification." Though
little publicity was given to this committee's investigation, Senator Erwin
issued a strong condemnation of the federal role in mind control. That
condemnation, however, did not halt mind control experiments, they just received
more circuitous funding.
Many of the case histories concerning individuals of whom the mind control
experiments were used, show a strange concept in the minds of those seeking
guinea pigs. Those subject to the mind control experiments would be given
indefinite sentences, his freedom was dependent upon how well the experiment
went. One individual, for example, was arrested for joyriding, given a two-year
sentence and held for mind control experiments. He was held for 18 years.
Here are just a few experiments used in the mind control program:
A naked inmate is strapped down on a board. His wrists and ankles are cuffed
to the board and his head is rigidly held in place by a strap around his neck
and a helmet on his head. He is left in a darkened cell, unable to remove his
body wastes. When a meal is delivered, one wrist is unlocked so he could feel
around in the dark for his food and attempt to pour liquid down his throat
without being able to lift his head.
Another experiment creates a muscle relaxant. Within 30 to 40 seconds
paralysis begins to invade the small muscles of the fingers, toes, and eyes
and then the inter costal muscles and diaphragm. The heart slows down to about
60 beats per minute. This condition, together with respiratory arrests, sets
in for as long as two to five minutes before the drug begins to wear off. The
individual remains fully conscious and is gasping for breath. It is "likened
to dying, it is almost like drowning" the experiment states.
Another drug induces vomiting and was administered to prisoners who didn't get
up on time or caught swearing or lying, or even not greeting their guards
formally. The treatment brings about uncontrolled vomiting that lasts from 15
minutes to an hour, accompanied by a temporary cardio vascular effect
involving changes in the blood pressure.
Another deals with creating body rigidness, aching restlessness, blurred
vision, severe muscular pain, trembling and fogged cognition.
The Department of Health, Education and Welfare and the U.S. Army have admitted
mind control experiments. Many deaths have occurred.
In tracing the steps of government mind control experiments, the trail leads to
legal and illegal usages, usage for covert intelligence operations, and
experiments on innocent people who were unaware that they were being used.
By Harry V. Martin and David Caul
Rock Group "Rush" Involved in MK ULTRA Project 
12
http://www.illuminati-news.com/articles2/00330.html
Edward Hunter | Crossroad 194 views
December 11, 2008
“Brainwashing is a system of befogging the brain so a person can be seduced into acceptance of what otherwise would be abhorrent to him. He loses touch with reality. Facts and fancy whirl round and change places… However, in order to prevent people from recognizing the inherent evils in brainwashing, the Reds pretend that it is only another name for something already very familiar and of unquestioned respect, such as education or reform.” — Edward Hunter, Brainwashing (New York, Pyramid Books, 1956, pages 185-186).
If you have read our articles or Brave New Schools or followed the implementation of Goals 2000 — the massive education program signed into law by President Clinton in 1994 — you would know that “education reform” has turned our education system upside-down. Our master plan comes from UNESCO, which published the blueprint for “lifelong learning” in 1973. The six goals announced by UNESCO at its World Conference on Education for All in 1990 became the original six goals for the American version of the global education system (See “Zero Tolerance for Non-Compliance”).
December 11, 2008
“Brainwashing is a system of befogging the brain so a person can be seduced into acceptance of what otherwise would be abhorrent to him. He loses touch with reality. Facts and fancy whirl round and change places… However, in order to prevent people from recognizing the inherent evils in brainwashing, the Reds pretend that it is only another name for something already very familiar and of unquestioned respect, such as education or reform.” — Edward Hunter, Brainwashing (New York, Pyramid Books, 1956, pages 185-186).
If you have read our articles or Brave New Schools or followed the implementation of Goals 2000 — the massive education program signed into law by President Clinton in 1994 — you would know that “education reform” has turned our education system upside-down. Our master plan comes from UNESCO, which published the blueprint for “lifelong learning” in 1973. The six goals announced by UNESCO at its World Conference on Education for All in 1990 became the original six goals for the American version of the global education system (See “Zero Tolerance for Non-Compliance”).
Infoshop News -
The surveillance technique came to light in an opinion published this week by U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan. He ruled that the "roving bug" was legal because federal wiretapping law is broad enough to permit eavesdropping even of conversations that take place near a suspect's cell phone.
Kaplan's opinion said that the eavesdropping technique "functioned whether the phone was powered on or off." Some handsets can't be fully powered down without removing the battery; for instance, some Nokia models will wake up when turned off if an alarm is set.
While the Genovese crime family prosecution appears to be the first time a remote-eavesdropping mechanism has been used in a criminal case, the technique has been discussed in security circles for years.
The U.S. Commerce Department's security office warns that "a cellular telephone can be turned into a microphone and transmitter for the purpose of listening to conversations in the vicinity of the phone." An article in the Financial Times last year said mobile providers can "remotely install a piece of software on to any handset, without the owner's knowledge, which will activate the microphone even when its owner is not making a call."
No comments:
Post a Comment