9/11 'Pentagon Punchout' mystery solved
Through a major heated online argument over the nite on liveleak.com wtach the drama unfold as my neverknwo info gets thrown in.
I was tested to the max once again. I was called out to a duel to preform another heroic act in the name of the 9/11 truth movement. I have found the answer to many years of collaborated research with fellow G's around the planet. The Challenge was offered by aka 'suitcaseman' on gnn.tv to find the answer to the biggest hole of 9/11. What produced the Hole on the inside of the 'A' ring at the
Pentagon. After many years of researching I stumbled across the 'Truth' and it has set me free.........and it will the rest of those G's who neverknwo about those explosives that I had
narrowed it down to the possiblities. Not Flight 77 or any parts from it. But Explosives were
planted and detonated to create the Biggest whole in the Crime of the this nation. Yes the government did in fact blow out the hole in the wall and this brief exert should explain the rest at the link provide below.
As you can see, they've punched a hole in here. This was punched by the rescue workers to clean it out. You can see this is the -- some of the unrenovated areas where the windows have blown out.
http://www.patriotresource.com/wtc/f.../0915/DoD.html
Check out the past research to finding the answers to the Biggest Hole in Criminal History.
As I blow the rising smoke from my majic finger tip, twirl my pistol, slide it back in my holster for another day and ride off quietly into the sunset.
9/11/01 satellite feed Pentagon video
"It was striking to me how little of the building was involved in the fire," said Dr. Corley, who has reviewed the Pentagon report. The fire, he said, "didn't spread and and trap other people in the building. "While 125 Pentagon workers and 59 passengers and crew members on the plane died, few if any of the workers who died were from outside the immediate impact zone."
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/05/nyregion/05TOWE.html
IF You believe a Plane caused that Hole in the Wall...........You have a Hole in your Head!
Through a major heated online argument over the nite on liveleak.com wtach the drama unfold as my neverknwo info gets thrown in.
I was tested to the max once again. I was called out to a duel to preform another heroic act in the name of the 9/11 truth movement. I have found the answer to many years of collaborated research with fellow G's around the planet. The Challenge was offered by aka 'suitcaseman' on gnn.tv to find the answer to the biggest hole of 9/11. What produced the Hole on the inside of the 'A' ring at the
Pentagon. After many years of researching I stumbled across the 'Truth' and it has set me free.........and it will the rest of those G's who neverknwo about those explosives that I had
narrowed it down to the possiblities. Not Flight 77 or any parts from it. But Explosives were
planted and detonated to create the Biggest whole in the Crime of the this nation. Yes the government did in fact blow out the hole in the wall and this brief exert should explain the rest at the link provide below.
As you can see, they've punched a hole in here. This was punched by the rescue workers to clean it out. You can see this is the -- some of the unrenovated areas where the windows have blown out.
http://www.patriotresource.com/wtc/f.../0915/DoD.html
Check out the past research to finding the answers to the Biggest Hole in Criminal History.
As I blow the rising smoke from my majic finger tip, twirl my pistol, slide it back in my holster for another day and ride off quietly into the sunset.
9/11/01 satellite feed Pentagon video
"It was striking to me how little of the building was involved in the fire," said Dr. Corley, who has reviewed the Pentagon report. The fire, he said, "didn't spread and and trap other people in the building. "While 125 Pentagon workers and 59 passengers and crew members on the plane died, few if any of the workers who died were from outside the immediate impact zone."
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/05/nyregion/05TOWE.html
9/11 Flight Data Recorder Smoking Gun
http://www.ntsb.gov/info/autopilot_aa77_ua93_study.pdfOk another inconstancy., Look at the data provided by the flight data recorder that I keep telling you about and you keep ignoring me and using ad hominem attacks . Come on, I dare ya to compare it with the video footage of the pentagon cctv footage.
Look at Flight 11 data ends at approx. 2000 feet
Flight 175 data ends at around 6000 feet.
Flight 77 has a final reading of an approx. 45 degree decent approach, the video footage shows an object flying into the pentagon at an angle of about 10-15 percent. It also shows that it was approx 20 miles away from where it took off, when it crashed.
This is the problem with the official stories.
The Flight Data Recorder shows flight 77 riding in on an erection. The blur on cctv looks like it's riding a limp dick.
Final Speed 462.....Final Altitude 180 feet.
140 feet above the tops of Light Poles
American 77 Final Maneuver from blackbox data recorder?
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d0f_1172167130
Fourth Check the Data on Flight 93 and the data shows it taking off at a second location and then the data stops at approx 6000 feet,.....then a crash site * approx 60 miles from where it took off.
Not passengers rushing the cockpit.
georgewashington.blogspot.com...
One of the most important parts of the official story is that the government couldn't track the location of the hijacked planes because the hijackers had turned the transponders off. The official version is that, with transponders turned off, only "primary radar" was available to civilian air traffic controllers. Primary radar can track location, but not altitude.
This makes no sense, because America's air defenses need to protect our nation against foreign fighter jets and other airplanes invading our country. Is our trillion-dollar defense system set up so that a Russian or Chinese pilot can invade undetected if he just turns off his transponder? Darn! Why didn't we think of that?!
Primary radar is a red herring.
Why?
Because the military possesses incredible sensitive radar. For example, "military radar can track space debris as small as 10 centimetres across" miles up in space.space.newscientist.com...
AWACS Should Have Tracked Planes
Airplanes known as AWACS have incredibly sensitive doppler radar that can detect any moving object. As an Army website states:
"Although Airborne Early Warning and Control System (AWACS) airborne radar can detect practically any moving object, aircraft radar operators routinely screen out objects moving slower than 85 miles per hour to avoid tracking motor vehicles."]
http://leav-www.army.mil/fmso/documents/attitude.pdf
There was, in fact, at least one AWACS near Washington, D.C. www.codeonemagazine.com... on the morning of 9/11 participating in a war game exercise. The pilot learned of the attacks soon after the first hit on the World Trade Center. www.stthomas.edu... at first he thought it was part of the war game exercise, "it didn't take him long to realize it was real." http://www.stthomas.edu/aquin/archive/041202/anaconda.html
The military should have had the pilot track all planes moving in and around the White House-Pentagon corridor. That would have been standard military protocol: to protect the command and control structure of the U.S. government and military.
The Pentagon-White House Corridor Is Highly-Monitored
Even if AWACS pilots were not instructed to monitor the area, the Pentagon and White House are two of the most heavily-defended buildings in the world. They are only 2 miles apart,www.cooperativeresearch.org... and the entire area is protected air space (because the area is home to the seat of power of the commander in chief and the military) and - because there have been numerous incidents of planes approaching the White House - it is entirely certain that the whole area is covered by very sophisticated military radar.
And keep in mind that installing military radar on the ground is much easier and less expensive than mounting it in a moving airplane.
Andrews Air Force Base is only 10 miles from the Pentagon, and has doppler radar even for public weather monitoring www.tenc.net...(if the base has doppler for something as mundane as weather monitoring, doesn't it make sense that the air force base closest to the Pentagon and White House would have sophisticated radar to protect the White House and Pentagon? Or do they just monitor the weather?)
The Pentagon itself also has access to the highly sophisticated PAVE PAWS radar which is capable of monitoring many planes or missiles simultaneously.www.fas.org...
Indeed, this CBS news article implies that military radar actually was tracking Flight 77 as it approached the Pentagon. And Dick Cheney -- sitting in a military command bunker underneath the White House-- monitored flight 77 for many miles as it approached the Pentagon (confirmed here).
The Other Planes
While I have focused on Flight 77 and the area surrounding the Pentagon, this diagram shows that all of the hijacked planes flew over numerous military bases on 9/11 before crashing. Those military bases undoubtedly possess highly-sophisticated radar as well.thememoryhole.com...
In addition, the is strong evidence that the planes were being tracked. For example, an ABC News article states:
"Controllers at the Boston Center knew American Airlines Flight 11, which departed at 7:59 a.m. ET from Boston for its flight to Los Angeles, was hijacked 30 minutes before it crashed. They tracked it to New York on their radar scopes. 'I watched the target of American 11 the whole way down,' said Boston controller Mark Hodgkins. "
Confirmed
All of the above-described information confirms the statement by a former air traffic controller, who knows the flight corridor which the two planes which hit the Twin Towers flew "like the back of my hand", and who handled two actual hijackings, that planes can be tracked on radar even when their transponders are turned off www.communitycurrency.org...(also, listen to this interview)video.google.com...
www.911blogger.com...
New York Daily News
...
======================================================
Look at Flight 11 data ends at approx. 2000 feet
Flight 175 data ends at around 6000 feet.
Flight 77 has a final reading of an approx. 45 degree decent approach, the video footage shows an object flying into the pentagon at an angle of about 10-15 percent. It also shows that it was approx 20 miles away from where it took off, when it crashed.
This is the problem with the official stories.
The Flight Data Recorder shows flight 77 riding in on an erection. The blur on cctv looks like it's riding a limp dick.
Final Speed 462.....Final Altitude 180 feet.
140 feet above the tops of Light Poles
American 77 Final Maneuver from blackbox data recorder?
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d0f_1172167130
Fourth Check the Data on Flight 93 and the data shows it taking off at a second location and then the data stops at approx 6000 feet,.....then a crash site * approx 60 miles from where it took off.
Not passengers rushing the cockpit.
georgewashington.blogspot.com...
One of the most important parts of the official story is that the government couldn't track the location of the hijacked planes because the hijackers had turned the transponders off. The official version is that, with transponders turned off, only "primary radar" was available to civilian air traffic controllers. Primary radar can track location, but not altitude.
This makes no sense, because America's air defenses need to protect our nation against foreign fighter jets and other airplanes invading our country. Is our trillion-dollar defense system set up so that a Russian or Chinese pilot can invade undetected if he just turns off his transponder? Darn! Why didn't we think of that?!
Primary radar is a red herring.
Why?
Because the military possesses incredible sensitive radar. For example, "military radar can track space debris as small as 10 centimetres across" miles up in space.space.newscientist.com...
AWACS Should Have Tracked Planes
Airplanes known as AWACS have incredibly sensitive doppler radar that can detect any moving object. As an Army website states:
"Although Airborne Early Warning and Control System (AWACS) airborne radar can detect practically any moving object, aircraft radar operators routinely screen out objects moving slower than 85 miles per hour to avoid tracking motor vehicles."]
http://leav-www.army.mil/fmso/documents/attitude.pdf
There was, in fact, at least one AWACS near Washington, D.C. www.codeonemagazine.com... on the morning of 9/11 participating in a war game exercise. The pilot learned of the attacks soon after the first hit on the World Trade Center. www.stthomas.edu... at first he thought it was part of the war game exercise, "it didn't take him long to realize it was real." http://www.stthomas.edu/aquin/archive/041202/anaconda.html
The military should have had the pilot track all planes moving in and around the White House-Pentagon corridor. That would have been standard military protocol: to protect the command and control structure of the U.S. government and military.
The Pentagon-White House Corridor Is Highly-Monitored
Even if AWACS pilots were not instructed to monitor the area, the Pentagon and White House are two of the most heavily-defended buildings in the world. They are only 2 miles apart,www.cooperativeresearch.org... and the entire area is protected air space (because the area is home to the seat of power of the commander in chief and the military) and - because there have been numerous incidents of planes approaching the White House - it is entirely certain that the whole area is covered by very sophisticated military radar.
And keep in mind that installing military radar on the ground is much easier and less expensive than mounting it in a moving airplane.
Andrews Air Force Base is only 10 miles from the Pentagon, and has doppler radar even for public weather monitoring www.tenc.net...(if the base has doppler for something as mundane as weather monitoring, doesn't it make sense that the air force base closest to the Pentagon and White House would have sophisticated radar to protect the White House and Pentagon? Or do they just monitor the weather?)
The Pentagon itself also has access to the highly sophisticated PAVE PAWS radar which is capable of monitoring many planes or missiles simultaneously.www.fas.org...
Indeed, this CBS news article implies that military radar actually was tracking Flight 77 as it approached the Pentagon. And Dick Cheney -- sitting in a military command bunker underneath the White House-- monitored flight 77 for many miles as it approached the Pentagon (confirmed here).
| At the Dulles tower, O'Brien saw the TV pictures from New York and headed back to her post to help other planes quickly land. "We started moving the planes as quickly as we could," she says. "Then I noticed the aircraft. It was an unidentified plane to the southwest of Dulles, moving at a very high rate of speed ... I had literally a blip and nothing more." O'Brien asked the controller sitting next to her, Tom Howell, if he saw it too. "I said, 'Oh my God, it looks like he's headed to the White House,'" recalls Howell. "I was yelling ... 'We've got a target headed right for the White House!'" At a speed of about 500 miles an hour, the plane was headed straight for what is known as P-56, protected air space 56, which covers the White House and the Capitol. "The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane," says O'Brien. "You don't fly a 757 in that manner. It's unsafe." The plane was between 12 and 14 miles away, says O'Brien, "and it was just a countdown. Ten miles west. Nine miles west ... Our supervisor picked up our line to the White House and started relaying to them the information, [that] we have an unidentified very fast-moving aircraft inbound toward your vicinity, 8 miles west." Vice President Cheney was rushed to a special basement bunker. White House staff members were told to run away from the building. "And it went six, five, four. And I had it in my mouth to say, three, and all of a sudden the plane turned away. In the room, it was almost a sense of relief. This must be a fighter. This must be one of our guys sent in, scrambled to patrol our capital, and to protect our president, and we sat back in our chairs and breathed for just a second," says O'Brien. But the plane continued to turn right until it had made a 360-degree maneuver. "We lost radar contact with that aircraft. And we waited. And we waited. And your heart is just beating out of your chest waiting to hear what's happened," says O'Brien. "And then the Washington National [Airport] controllers came over our speakers in our room and said, 'Dulles, hold all of our inbound traffic. The Pentagon's been hit.'" http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/2020/2020/2020_011024_atc_feature.html |
The Other Planes
While I have focused on Flight 77 and the area surrounding the Pentagon, this diagram shows that all of the hijacked planes flew over numerous military bases on 9/11 before crashing. Those military bases undoubtedly possess highly-sophisticated radar as well.thememoryhole.com...
In addition, the is strong evidence that the planes were being tracked. For example, an ABC News article states:
"Controllers at the Boston Center knew American Airlines Flight 11, which departed at 7:59 a.m. ET from Boston for its flight to Los Angeles, was hijacked 30 minutes before it crashed. They tracked it to New York on their radar scopes. 'I watched the target of American 11 the whole way down,' said Boston controller Mark Hodgkins. "
Confirmed
All of the above-described information confirms the statement by a former air traffic controller, who knows the flight corridor which the two planes which hit the Twin Towers flew "like the back of my hand", and who handled two actual hijackings, that planes can be tracked on radar even when their transponders are turned off www.communitycurrency.org...(also, listen to this interview)video.google.com...
www.911blogger.com...
New York Daily News
9/11 foundation head arrested during benefit concert
The Star-Ledger - NJ.com, NJ -15 hours ago
BY BILL SWAYZE A Jefferson man claiming to raise money for 9/11 victims with a benefit concert in Carlstadt last night was escorted out of the venue in ...
Ground Zero 'hero' arrested at fund-raiser actually a fraud ...New York Daily News
Entries from Gothamist tagged with 'fake911story'Gothamist
all 5 news articles »
The Star-Ledger - NJ.com, NJ -
BY BILL SWAYZE A Jefferson man claiming to raise money for 9/11 victims with a benefit concert in Carlstadt last night was escorted out of the venue in ...
Ground Zero 'hero' arrested at fund-raiser actually a fraud ...
Entries from Gothamist tagged with 'fake911story'
PART V: Quick To Defend Alleged Terrorists, CAIR Even Questioned ...
Counterterrorism Blog, NJ -Mar 28, 2008
Days after the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, CAIR-New York Executive Director Ghazi Khankan used an online chat with the ...
Counterterrorism Blog, NJ -
Days after the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, CAIR-New York Executive Director Ghazi Khankan used an online chat with the ...
Skirting the Law Does Not Make Us Safer
Huffington Post, NY -25 minutes ago
The 9-11 Commission, the congressional oversight committees and other national security experts have told us how and why 19 Al Qaeda terrorists were able to ...
Huffington Post, NY -
The 9-11 Commission, the congressional oversight committees and other national security experts have told us how and why 19 Al Qaeda terrorists were able to ...
|
Pre- 9/11 Intelligence Problems Still Exist
Human Events, DC -Mar 28, 2008
But according to a new study by the Rand Corporation, post-9-11 intelligence the reforms have not solved the problems that enabled al-Queda’s plot to go ...
Human Events, DC -
But according to a new study by the Rand Corporation, post-9-11 intelligence the reforms have not solved the problems that enabled al-Queda’s plot to go ...
Man admits 9/11 fraud
The Times of Trenton - NJ.com, NJ -Mar 27, 2008
BY RYAN TRACY Scott Shields, the West Windsor resident now famous for allegedly false claims that his dog Bear helped discover victims of the World Trade ...
W. Windsor man pleads guilty in 9/11 relief fund fraudThe Times of Trenton - NJ.com
all 2 news articles »
The Times of Trenton - NJ.com, NJ -
BY RYAN TRACY Scott Shields, the West Windsor resident now famous for allegedly false claims that his dog Bear helped discover victims of the World Trade ...
W. Windsor man pleads guilty in 9/11 relief fund fraud
|
Trading Privacy for Security in a Post-9/11 World:
IPD Group (press release), DC -Mar 27, 2008
Since 9/11, Americans have struggled to agree on an acceptable balance. The War on Terror has raised questions about protecting civil liberties and privacy ...
IPD Group (press release), DC -
Since 9/11, Americans have struggled to agree on an acceptable balance. The War on Terror has raised questions about protecting civil liberties and privacy ...
Horrors of 9/11 discussed by author; Wife of terrorist attack ...
Peterborough Examiner, Canada -Mar 27, 2008
But the special circumstances of 9/11 made her husband's not an ordinary death. Amid the shock and sorrow, Ms. Carter says, "Suddenly, I was weirdly famous. ...
Peterborough Examiner, Canada -
But the special circumstances of 9/11 made her husband's not an ordinary death. Amid the shock and sorrow, Ms. Carter says, "Suddenly, I was weirdly famous. ...
...
 Center for Research on Globalization | 25 Intolerable Contradictions: The Final Undoing of the Official 9/11 ... Center for Research on Globalization, Canada - With regard to the identity of the plane spotted over the White House around the time of the Pentagon strike: The military’s denial that it was a military ... |
======================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment